The Singapore REIT market provided a number of key transactions in 2025, ranging from the IPOs of NTT DC REIT and Centurion Accommodation REIT to the delisting of Frasers Hospitality Trust.
Overall, most REITs’ share prices ended the year on a positive note, with the exception of small and mid-cap REITs that underperformed due to headwinds facing their business.
In this article, we go through each of the REIT sectors: office, industrial, retail, hospitality / lodging, healthcare, data centres, and diversified, and summarize key transactions that happened in 2025, especially the latter part of the year.
Firstly, to set the context, according to REITAS, there are 5 REIT ETFs traded on the Singapore stock exchange.
Lion-Philip S-REIT ETF (CLR)
Amova-Straits Trading Asia ex Japan REIT Index (CFA)
Philip SGX APAC Dividend Leaders REIT ETF (BYI)
CSOP iEdge S-REIT Leaders ETF (SRT)
UOB Asia Pacific Green REIT ETF (GRN)
All the ETFs have provided positive returns of between 13%-23% for the year, and as we will see below, this is reflected in most of the individual REIT performance.
Performance of REIT ETFs listed on the SGX
Office REITs
Some notable developments among the office REITs include the following
Keppel REIT
Acquisition of 75% interest in Top Ryde City Shopping Centre in Dec 2025 for A$393.8m or approximately S$334.8m. The acquisition of the regional mall in Sydney represents Keppel REIT’s strategic expansion into the retail asset class. The acquisition is expected to be DPU-accretive and will enhance Keppe REIT’s overall returns, while strategically complementing its Singapore office-focused portfolio.
Acquisition of one-third interest in Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3 in Dec 2025 at an agreed property value of S$1,453m or approximately S$3,268 pft. This agreed property value is approximately 1.0% below the property’s independent valuation. Post-completion, Keppel REIT will hold in aggregate two-third interest in MBFC Tower 3. The remaining one-third will be held by DBS Bank, which is also the tower’s anchor tenant.
Elite UK REIT
Elite UK REIT acquired three government-leased properties in June 2025. The total acquisition amounted to GBP 9.2 million, and the seller was Elite Phoenix Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Elite UK Commercial Fund III. According to official press releases, the properties provide a gross rental income yield of 9.2%, and are expected to be 0.6% DPU accretive to Elite UK REIT.
The REIT also divested Crown Buildings, Caerphilly at GBP 710,000, an 18% premium to valuation in Mar 2025.
Manulife US REIT
Manulife US REIT continues to underperform, returning a negative 22% for the whole year. Some notable developments for Manulife US REIT in the Oct to Dec 2025 period included
An EGM to vote on the acquisition and disposition mandates pursuant to the Growth and Value Up plan. Both were passed with 83.1% voting for the disposition plan and 83% voting for the acquisition plan. The plans provide for a broadened investment mandate to invest in income-producing real-estate in the US and Canada, with a focus on industrial, living sector and retail assets. It also allows for the revitalization of the portfolio through the sale of up to three office assets with proceeds used to acquire new assets, repay debt and fund capital expenditures, tenant incentives and leasing costs. The objective is to lower Manulife US REIT’s aggregate leverage.
According to REITAS, office REITs comprise the following
Keppel (K71U)
Prime US (OXMU)
Keppel Pacific Oak US (CMOU)
Manulife US (BTOU)
Elite UK (MXNU)
Throughout 2025, all the office REITs, with the exception of Manulife US REIT, provided positive returns of 18%-36%. Manulife US REIT declined approximately 22%.
Office REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
Industrial REITs
Some notable developments among the industrial REITs include the following
CapitaLand Ascendas
Acquisition of 3 properties in Singapore – 2 Pioneer Sector 1, Tuas Connection and 9 Kallang Sector in Dec 2025
Acquisition of 5 Science Park Drive for S$137.1m and 9 Tai Seng Drive (expected S$275.5m)
Divestment of Astmoor Road in the UK in Nov 202 and 95 Gilmore Road in Australia in Dec 2025
Acquisition of two freehold plots of land in the East Midlands, UK, in Aug 2025
ESR REIT
Divestment of a portfolio of 8 industrial properties in Singapore for an aggregate sale consideration of S$338.1m in Dec 2025. The properties are located mainly in the western part of Singapore, around the Pioneer, Jurong Port, and Tuas areas. The rationale of the divestment is to minimize the impact of land lease decay and reduce the decline in NAV of the REIT, while balancing the needs of stable, growing distributions and having a future-ready asset portfolio that delivers sustainable returns to unitholders.
Mapletree Industrial Trust
Divestment of three industrial properties in Singapore, namely 2 International Business Park, The Synergy, and Marsiling Industrial Estate, for a total sale consideration of S$535.3m. The divestment rationale is part of the REIT manager’s strategy to deliver sustainable returns by reviewing the portfolio’s composition and to redeploy capital towards potential investment opportunities.
According to REITAS, industrial REITs comprise the following
CapitaLand Ascendas (A17U)
Mapletree Logistics (M44U)
Mapletree Industrial (ME8U)
ESR (9A4U)
AIMS APAC (O5RU)
Alpha Integrated (M1GU)
Daiwa House Logistics (DHLU)
Throughout 2025, all the industrial REITs except Mapletree Industrial Trust provided positive returns of 5%-45%. Mapletree Industrial Trust slightly underperformed with a decline of 1%.
Industrial REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
Retail REITs
Some notable developments among the retail REITs include the following
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Acquisition of Northpoint City South Wing for S$1.17b in Mar 2025. Following the acquisition, Frasers Centrepoint Trust owns 100% of Northpoint City’s North Wing and South Wing, giving it the opportunity to unlock value through AEIs, tenant mix strategies, and enhancing operations. Frasers Centrepoint Trust’s market share of suburban shopping centre by net lettable area also increased to 10.3% from 9.1%, strengthening its leadership position.
United Hampshire US REIT
Acquisition of Dover Marketplace for US$16.375m in Aug 2025. Dover Marketplace is a retail neighbourhood shopping centre in Dover Township, York County, Pennsylvania, anchored by the GIANT Company, which is owned by Ahold Delhaize, a leading supermarket operator in the Mid-Atlantic region of the US. The acquisition is expected to be accretive to United Hampshire US REIT’s DPU by 2.0% (together with the Albany divestment).
According to REITAS, retail REITs comprise the following
Frasers Centrepoint (J69U)
Starhill Global (P40U)
Sasseur (CRPU)
Lippo Malls Indonesia (D5IU)
United Hampshire US (ODBU)
BHG Retail (BMGU)
Throughout 2025, all the retail REITs, with the exception of Lippo Malls Indonesia and BHG Retail REIT, provided positive returns of 9%-25%.
Retail REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
Hospitality / lodging REITs
Some notable developments among the hospitality / lodging REITs include the following
Centurion Accommodation REIT
The highlight among hospitality / lodging REITs is the IPO of Centurion Accommodation REIT in Sep 2025. The REIT listed with 14 properties initially, before it will expand to 15 with EPIISOD Macquarie Park. The initial portfolio size will be S$1.84b, before expanding to S$2.12b. The IPO offer price was at S$0.88 per unit, and as at the time of this article, it has risen to S$1.15. The gearing ratio was 20.9% at IPO, before it is expected to rise to 31% post the EPIISO acquisition. Dividend yield is forecasted to be between 7-8% in FY2026 and FY2027.
CapitaLand Ascott REIT
Divestment of Citadines Central Shinjuku Tokyo in Jul 2025 for JPY25b or approximately S$222.7m. The property has 206 rooms with a gross floor area of approximately 8,085 sqm and was built in 2008. It has a freehold tenure.
Acquisition of three rental housing properties in Japan for JPY4b in Aug 2025. Two of the rental housing properties are in Osaka while the third is in Kyoto. The acquisition is expected to be accretive to DPU by 0.3%, and is in line with CapitaLand Ascott REIT’s strategy to focus on Japan, which has strong living sector fundamentals.
Frasers Hospitality Trust
Another significant transaction in 2025 was the delisting of Frasers Hospitality Trust in Sep 2025 at an offer price of S$0.71 per stapled security. The rationale for the divestment was the trust’s struggle to boost distributions and growth amid economic headwinds and FX challenges. The REIT previously had a portfolio value of approximately S$2b.
According to REITAS, hospitality / lodging REITs comprise the following
CapitaLand Ascott (HMN)
CDL Hospitality (J85)
Far East Hospitality (Q5T)
Centurion Accommodation (8C8U)
Acrophyte Hospitality (XZL)
Throuughout 2025, all the hospitality REITs provided positive returns of 2%-39%.
Hospitality / lodging REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
Healthcare and data centre REITs
Some notable developments among the healthcare and data centre REITs include the following
NTT DC REIT
A significant transaction in 2025 was the listing of NTT DC REIT in Jul 2025. The IPO portfolio comprised 6 institutional-quality data centres valued at US$1.6b, located in the US, Austria and Singapore, with a 94.3% occupancy rate. The forecasted annualized distribution yields are between 7.5%-7.8% based on the offer price of US$1.00 per unit. Cornerstone investors includes Singapore’s own sovereign wealth fund, GIC, who have subscribed for an aggregate of 172.8 million units, which represents 16.8% of the units in issue after offering.
According to REITAS, healthcare REITs comprise the following
Parkway Life (C2PU)
First REIT (AW9U)
According to REITAS, data centre REITs comprise the following
Keppel DC (AJBU)
NTT DC (NTDU)
Digital Core (DCRU)
Throughout 2025, all healthcare REITs and one data centre REIT (Keppel DC REIT) delivered positive returns of 5%-22%. The two data centre REITs that underperformed was Digital Core REIT and NTT DC REIT.
Healthcare and data centre REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
Diversified REITs
Some notable developments among the diversified REITs include the following
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust’s acquisition of the remaining 55% interest in CapitaSpring in Aug 2025 based on an agreed property value of S$1.9b. The acquisition is expected to deliver DPU accretion of 1.1% and strengthen CICT’s leadership position in Singapore’s commercial real estate market.
Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust
Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust’s divestment of 357 Collins Street in Melbourne in Sep 2025 for A$192.1m. This comes on the back of market conditions remaining challenging in the Melbourne CBD office sector. According to the REIT manager’s CEO Anthea Lee, the divestment is a strategic step in their ongoing portfolio reconstitution, which will allow the REIT to extract value from a commercial proeprty and re-weight the portfolio towards logistics & industrial properties.
Lendlease Global Commercial REIT
Lendlease Global Commercial REIT’s acquisition of a 70% interest in PLQ mall which completed in Nov 2025. The agreed property value was S$885m, and Lendlease REIT financed the acquisition through a private placement of approximately S$280m. Among other reasons, a key acquisition rationale was to strengthen the portfolio’s diversity and income stability, with exposure to essential services rising from 57.7% to 59.9%, and to expand the REIT’s exposure in Singapore.
Lendlease Global Commercial REIT’s divestment of the office component of Jem in Aug 2025. The sale was completed at a consideration of S$462m, and the key reasons for the divestment was to improve the REIT’s financial position, enhance financial flexibility to support portfolio growth and to realise the value of Jem office, among other reasons.
According to REITAS, diversified REITs comprise the following
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial (C38U)
Mapletree Pan Asia (N2IU)
Suntec REIT (T82U)
Frasers Logistics & Commercial (BUOU)
OUE REIT (TS0U)
CapitaLand China (AU8U)
Lendlease Global Commercial (JYEU)
CapitaLand India (CY6U)
Stoneweg European (SET)
IREIT Global (8U7U)
Throughout 2025, all of the diversified REITs provided positive returns (including dividends) of 8%-33%, with the exception of IREIT Global, which announced in Jul 2025 that its wholly-owned subsidiaries were served with payment orders by the former main tenant at Berlin Campus. IREIT Global declined approximately 4% throughout the year.
Diversified REITs price performance for 2025 (including dividends)
In the month of December, resale transaction activity of condominiums slowed compared to the previous few months, consistent with the trend in past years, as most people head overseas for holidays or back to their home countries.
A total of 763 resale condominiums were transacted, lower than 864 the previous month.
Throughout the whole year, the peak periods of when transactions were completed were two periods of around Mar and Apr, and Sep.
During these 3 months, an average of 1,200 resale condominiums were transacted.
Number of resale condominium (excluding executive condominiums) units transacted in 2025
Resale prices per sqft generally dropped slightly across all regions between Nov and Dec
CCR: S$2,173 psf, lower than S$2,266 in Nov
RCR: S$1,928, lower than S$1,955 in Nov
OCR: S$1,550, lower than S$1,560 in Nov
Despite the drop in resale psf prices between Nov and Dec, throughout the whole year, however, there was some slight divergence in per sqft prices across regions.
CCR: S$2,173, lower than S$2,226 in Jan (2.4% decrease)
RCR: S$1,928, higher than S$1,873 in Jan (2.9% increase)
OCR: S$1,550, higher than S$1,496 in Jan (3.6% increase)
Resale condominiums (excluding executive condominiums) prices per sqft in 2025
Absolute prices of units transacted rose in the OCR but fell in the CCR and RCR between Nov and Dec
CCR: S$2.974m, lower than S$3.254m in Nov
RCR: S$1.818m, lower than S$1.922m in Nov
OCR: S$1.607m, higher than S$1.582m in Nov
Throughout the whole year, the absolute prices of units were largely flat in the CCR, while they dropped in the RCR and rose in the OCR.
CCR: S$2.974m, slightly higher than S$2.913m in Jan (2.1% increase)
RCR: S$1.818m, lower than S$1.963m in Jan (7.4% decrease)
OCR: S$1.607m, higher than S$1.523m in Jan (5.5% increase)
Resale condominiums (excluding executive condominiums) prices per unit in 2025
Sizes of units transacted fell for the CCR and RCR but rose in the OCR between Nov and Dec
CCR: 1,408 sqft, lower than 1,430 sqft in Nov
RCR: 959 sqft, lower than 988 sqft in Nov
OCR: 1,058 sqft, higher than 1,047 sqft in Nov
Throughout the year, the sizes of units was up significantly in the CCR, down significantly in the RCR, and flat in the OCR
CCR: 1,408 sqft, higher than 1,274 sqft in Jan
RCR: 959 sqft, lower than 1,082 sqft in Jan
OCR: 1,058 sqft, similar to 1,408 sqft in Jan
Resale condominiums (excluding executive condominiums) average size per unit in 2025
Shophouses have been a feature of Singapore’s property landscape since the early 1800’s.
Through the years, it has evolved and modernized, and today it is an asset class that is heavily in demand by high-net-worth investors and institutions.
In this article, we explore
What are shophouses
History of shophouses in Singapore
Types of shophouses
Architectural heritage and artistic appeal
Flexible use as commercial or residential space
Shophouse clusters in Singapore
Relative scarcity and freehold in tenure
A new generation of shophouses
Demand, supply, vacancy, rents and prices
How to invest in shophouses
Notable deals
Challenges and risks investing in shophouses
A bright outlook
Design of shop houses since the early 1800’s. Source: Straits Times
What are shophouses?
Shophouses in Singapore are iconic low-rise buildings that are used purely for commercial uses, or combine commercial and residential uses in a single structure.
For shophouses with mixed uses, the ground floor is typically used for retail, F&B, or offices, while the upper floors serve as living quarters.
These structures were designed for dual functionality, reflecting Singapore’s early urban development, in which people lived close to their businesses.
Key interior elements of a typical shophouse
A standard feature of shophouses include a five-foot way – a pedestrian walkway mandated by Sir Stamford Raffles in 1822 – to provide shelter and improved pedestrian connectivity.
Another was the use of internal air wells or courtyards to facilitate ventilation, and timber shutters and tiled facades to address Singapore’s tropical climate.
Shophouse designs were inspired by both colonial Dutch architecture in Java and designs of Southern Chinese courtyard houses brought by immigrants from Guangdong and Fujian.
Because property taxes were historically based on building width, shophouses are notably narrow at the front but extend deep into the city block.
Five foot way exampleFive foot way example
Five-foot ways are common features of shophouses and the flooring is a unique mark that sets them apart from other buildings.
Traditional five foot way finishesTraditional five foot way finishesTraditional five foot way finishes
The facade of shophouses are also characteristic and unique, reflecting the culture, influence and design languge of its time.
Common features of a shophouse’s first storeyCommon features of a shophouse’s upper storey facadeSome shophouses have open balconies with an inner facade
Most shophouse footprints range in size from 1,000 to 1,500 sqft. Dimensions in the front are usually 4 to 6 metres, and the depth is usually 20 to 30 metres.
For a 2 to 3-storey shophouse, the gross floor area across all the floors will then typically be 3,000 to 5,000 sqft.
There are some shophouses that have rear extensions and attics, and this can increase the gross floor area to 8,000 to 10,000 sqft or more.
History of shophouses in Singapore
The history of the Singapore shophouse begins with the arrival of Sir Stamford Raffles and his Raffles Town Plan of 1822 (also known as the Jackson plan).
The Jackson town plan was a town-planning initiative that mandated uniform buildings with a covered walkway, and this birthed the shophouse’s distinctive narrow and deep form.
Houses were built of masonry and tile roofs to prevent fires in the dense areas with many immigrants.
Most of today’s shophouses were built between the 1840s and 1960s and emerged as a practical solution for merchants who needed to live and work in the same place.
Distinct architectural styles evolved over time, including Early, First Transitional, Late, Second Transitional, Art Deco, and Modern. These stages reflected Singapore’s growing prosperity.
The characteristics of shophouses at these stages can be described as such –
Early 1840-1900: Shophouses of this style are shorter and have one or two timber windows on the upper storey facade. The early builders made use of locally-sourced construction materials. Plaster ornamentation is minimal.
First transitional 1900 to 1915: With increased wealth and an influx of skilled labour, shophouses became taller and decorated with plaster and tile. The addition of small glass panels to timber windows became increasingly common.
Late 1900 to 1940: This is the most spectacular style, particularly in the extensive use of plaster, tile and cast iron ornamentation. Each upper storey facade has three windows with minimal wall in between for maximum ventilation.
Second transitional 1935-1940: Shophouses of this style are simpler and more streamlined as builders began to cut down on the use of ornamentation; perhaps as a reaction to the exuberant spirit of the Late syle and to the economic situation of the time.
Art Deco 1930-1960: The Art Deco style is typified by streamlining of classical motifs such as column orders, arches, and pediments into geometric designs. A common feature is a plaque with the date of the building’s construction. Shanghai Plaster was a popular surface treatment.
Modern 1950-1960: Common features are the innovative use of thin concrete fins and air vents, which are functional as well as decorative. Flat roofs became the norm. Mild steel windows complemented the geometric facade.
Evolution of shophouse designs
In the 1960’s, many shophouses fell into disrepair due to rent control laws and urban modernization.
However, a pivotal shift occurred in 1986, when the URA unveiled its Conservation Master Plan. This saved shophouses in historic districts like Chinatown and Emerald Hill from demolition.
Today, these restored gems have transformed from working-class dwellings into prestige assets, housing Michelin-starred restaurants and family offices, serving as tangible monuments to Singapore’s multicultural heritage.
Types of shophouses
1. HDB shophouses
Managed by the Housing & Development Board, HDB shophouses are a staple of Singapore’s older public housing estates.
These functional structures are designed to serve the community’s daily needs, housing essential amenities such as family clinics, convenience stores, and neighborhood eateries.
Unlike their ornate heritage counterparts, HDB shophouses feature a modern, pragmatic design that blends into the surrounding housing blocks, typically pairing a ground-floor commercial space with a residential flat above.
Ultimately, these units act as vital neighborhood anchors, focusing on social utility and local convenience rather than high-end investment potential.
2. Conservation shophouses
Carefully preserved by the Urban Redevelopment Authority for their immense architectural and cultural significance, these iconic structures boast distinctive features such as elaborate ornate facades, traditional timber shutters, vibrant Peranakan tiles, and intricately decorated pintu pagar (swing doors) and windows.
Echoing Singapore’s rich multicultural heritage—from Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Peranakan influences—these shophouses today seamlessly blend the old with the new, hosting diverse modern uses including professional offices, boutique retail shops, trendy cafés, and creative spaces, all while meticulously retaining their timeless historical charm.
3. Commercial and mixed-use shophouses
Commercial and mixed-use shophouses represent a resilient asset class concentrated in Singapore’s Core Central Region (CBD, Orchard Fringe) and select affluent enclaves.
These structures support a strategic vertical tenant mix—typically blending high-yield ground-floor retail or F&B with upper-level boutique office or residential spaces.
Available in both conserved and non-conserved formats, they offer investors a defensive, flexible vehicle capable of capturing diverse rental demand cycles from a single title deed
4. Residential shophouses
Residential shophouses are properties used solely for residential living, with no retail or commercial activities.
They are typically found along quieter streets or within select conservation areas, appealing to owner-occupiers who value heritage character, individuality, and a distinctive living environment.
Rather than being driven by rental yield or business use, their appeal lies in architectural identity, privacy, and scarcity, making them prized as character homes rather than income-generating assets.
5. Industrial shophouses
Industrial shophouses represent a high-yield, pragmatic alternative to traditional commercial real estate.
Located in key industrial clusters, these functional assets are designed for essential economy services—from central kitchens to logistics workshops.
Unlike flatted factories, they often offer ground-floor loading access and high ceilings, making them highly desirable for SMEs.
For investors, they offer a ‘sweet spot’: the landed tenure of a shophouse combined with the typically higher rental yields of the industrial sector, often without the heavy tax burden of residential assets
Architectural heritage and artistic appeal
Architecturally, shophouses are a unique and eclectic blend of Chinese, Malay, and European influences (often called “Peranakan” style).
The design is best embodies in the “Singapore Eclectic” or “Chinese Baroque” style of the early 20th century.
During this era, shophouse facades became canvases for a riot of ornamentation, where European Corinthian columns and French windows stood alongside auspicious Chinese motifs like dragons, phoenixes, and zodiac animals.
Artistic heritage is found greatest in the meticulous details of shophouses built primarily in the 1900-1940s. Design language used during that period comprised the following
Majolica Tiles: Colorful, ornate ceramic tiles imported from Europe and Japan adorn the facades and walls, depicting floral and geometric motifs.
Intricate Plasterwork: Elaborate reliefs featuring Chinese motifs like phoenixes and dragons are often found alongside European festoons and garlands above windows and doorways.
French Windows and Louvred Shutters: These elements add a touch of colonial elegance and are both functional and beautiful.
Facade finishes of shophouses
Flexible use as commercial or residential space
For this article, we will focus on shophouses that are either zoned “Commercial” or “Residential with Commercial at 1st storey”.
Shophouses zoned “Commercial” are the most ‘liquid’ assets since they are used purely for commercial purposes and can be bought by foreigners without Additional Buyer Stamp Duty.
The flexibility lies in the diversity of permissible tenants. With URA “Change of Use” approval, an upper floor can pivot from a boutique corporate HQ to a high-end aesthetic clinic, a yoga studio, or a private members’ club.
This protects the landlord from sector-specific downturns; if the office leasing market softens, the “wellness” or “lifestyle” economy can fill the void without requiring structural redevelopment.
For shophouses zoned “Residential with Commercial at 1st Storey”, the asset captures two distinct demand cycles. The ground floor generates high-yield commercial income (often F&B), while the upper floors tap into the residential rental market, which is driven by different macro factors.
This hybrid structure is increasingly popular with “creative class” tenants who seek a unique “Live-Work” environment. However, investors must note the tax trade-off: unlike pure commercial units, the residential portion of these hybrid assets will attract Buyer’s Stamp Duty, and if applicable, Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty.
Foreigners also need approval from the Land Dealings Approval Unit of the Singapore Land Authority to purchase shop houses with a residential element.
URA masterplan legend, source: URA
Crucially, most shophouses are zoned “Commercial”, meaning foreigners can purchase them without paying hefty stamp duties that apply to residential property.
Additionally, this makes shophouses a suitable investment target for Family Offices and institutional capital.
Shophouse clustersin Singapore
Geographically, shophouses are clustered in the central districts of Singapore.
Some of these districts are historic in nature, like Chinatown, Kampong Glam, Boat Quay, Tanjong Pagar, Emerald Hill and Little India.
However, there are other shophouse clusters at Balestier, Tiong Bahru, Bugis, and Everton Park.
Outside of central Singapore, there are shophouse clusters in East Coast, Katong, Joo Chiat, Upper Serangoon, Thomson, Pasir Panjang and Buona Vista.
Emerald Hill shophouse clusterChinatown, Boat Quay and Tanjong Pagar shophouse clusterLittle India, Jalan Besar, Kampong Glam, Arab Street, Haji Lane shophouse clusterBugis shophouse clusterBalestier shophouse clusterEverton Park shophouse clusterTiong Bahru shophouse clusterEast Coast shophouse clusterGeylang and Joo Chiat shophouse clusterThomson shophouse clusterPasir Panjang, South Buona Vista shophouse clusterUpper Bukit Timah, Jalan Jurong Kechil shophouse clusterUpper Serangoon shophouse cluster
Relative scarcity and freehold in tenure
Most shophouses in Singapore are freehold in nature, and this is reflective of their completion in the early days of Singapore, when freehold land was abundant. Only a minority of shophouses are leasehold in nature.
Based on a database of transactions from URA, the breakdown of shophouse tenure is as follows
Leasehold (comprising 99 up to 200 years leases): 14%
Freehold (comprising anything above 200 years to freehold): 64%
NA (not classified due to unknown tenure ): 22%
The preponderance of freehold shophouses is another factor that makes it attractive to investors who want to have something to hold for multiple generations.
Because the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has accorded conservation status to only about 6,500 units, supply is also strictly capped and there is virtually no new construction of such units.
This scarcity creates immense capital appreciation potential and from an investment perspective, shophouses are considered “trophy assets.”
A new generation of shophouses
It’s time to shed the old stuffy image of coolies and blue-collar workers occupying shophouses.
Tenants of modern day shophouses now span a wide range of industries, from Michelin-listed restaurants, to cocktail bars, all the way to medical aesthetics clinics.
Their clientele of these shophouse tenants have also accordingly evolved into a crowd that is well-travelled, well-heeld, creative and global minded, reflective of Singapore’s development from a third-world city into one that is at the cutting edge of trends globally.
Thevar is an upscale and modern Indian restaurant situated in a shophouseKelly Oriental Aesthetic clinic is situated in Holland Village Live Twice is a cocktail bar at Bukit Pasoh near Tanjong Pagar
Demand, supply, vacancy, rents and prices
Demand
Because of strong shophouse demand from both investors and tenants, shophouses are frequently transacted.
The peak of shophouse transaction volume occurred in 2007 when prices were in the S$1,100 psf range.
In that year, about 520 shophouses changed hands, compared to a range of about 100 to 300 in the years prior.
There was some moderation in transaction volume and subsequent to the peak in 2007 and the global financial crisis, transaction volume moderated to around 100 to 200 annually.
Number of annual shophouse transactions, source: URA
Supply
There is virtually no new supply of shophouses in Singapore as they are a historical building type constructed only between 1840’s and 1960’s.
Hence, the stock of shohouses is fixed and finite. This leads to sticky prices as demand is strong while supply is virtually capped.
One other reason for there being no construction of new shophouses is that they are not land-efficient.
In Singapore’s dense urban landscape, 2-storey shophouses would not be a good use of land, as compared to a 30-storey skyscraper which can house many more tenants, uses and economic activity.
Whilst there may be other supply of ‘shophouses’, these are mainly ‘pesudo’ shophouses built in HDB towns (like Bidadari or Punggol), and they do not carry the same sentimental value and heritage as do those that were built in the 20th century.
Vacancy
While there are no official statistics on shophouse vacancies, on-the-ground checks indicate that vacancy rates are virtually zero.
A walk around various shophouse clusters islandwide will attest to that.
The only exception are shophouse clusters that are very dated and where little to no upkeep has been done. However, such clusters are very few and far between.
Shophouse vacancies only occur when such units need to undergo refurbishment or asset enhancement works. Even then, these shophouses are re-tenanted very quickly when they become available for lease again.
Rents
Shophouse rents are on average S$6.5 psf as of 2025, translating into S$13,00 to S$26,000 per month for a 2,000 and 4,000 sqft space, respectively.
Historically, shophouse rents have trended upwards, in tandem with healthy demand and very little supply. As we will see later, shophouse prices have also followed this general uptrend.
Average psf rents for shophouses, source: URA
Prices
Shophouse prices have gone through 2 waves of increases, the first being the period after the global financial crisis in 2010 to 2013, where per sq foot prices rose from about S$1,100 to S$3,700 over a period of 5 years.
Prices subsequently plateaued between 2013 to 2021 at the S$3,800 psf to S$4,200 psf range, before rising again during COVID from 2021 to 2034, to a high of around S$5,200 psf.
Since then, in 2024, prices have somewhat moderated as interest rates began to climb and the market took a breather.
Prices as of 2025 are around the S$4,800 psf mark.
Across the entire history of data available, from 1995 to 2025, the annualized growth rate of shophouse prices is 4.8%, meaning S$100 invested into the sector would have turned into S$408.
Average psf prices of shophouses, source: URA
Together with the increase in per sq foot prices, average ticket size of shophouses has also risen, to around S$7 million as of 2025.
Average prices between 1995 to 2007 were around S$2 million. Post the global financial crisis, prices began a multi-year rise to around S$7 million.
At these price levels, it is most likely the investible domain of high-net-worth institutional investors or a consortium of investors.
Average price of shophouses, source: URA
In terms of price and psf difference between leasehold and freehold shophouses, they tracked quite closely before 2012, but it is a little surprising that they have they have diverged since then, as seen in the 2 charts below.
Average psf prices of freehold and leasehold shophouses. Unknown refers to earlier periods when records were not comprehensive.Average prices of freehold and leasehold shophouses. Unknown refers to earlier periods when records were not comprehensive.
The divergence could be due to the strong investor demand for shophouses at a time when capital and liquidity were abundant, while interest rates were low, leading to prices being driven higher.
Another reason could be that freehold shophouses are very tightly held and rarely put up for sale. Due to the limited supply of investible freehold stock, investors gravitated to the next best option which was to invest in leasehold units.
How to investin shophouses
Here’s a quick checklist of things to take note of before investing in shophouses.
Location
Investible areas are only clusters where shophouses are located. Check out the earlier part of this article on the main clusters around Singapore.
Planning and zoning
As mentioned earlier, for the purpose of this article, our focus is on shophouses that are zoned either “Commercial” or “Residential with Commercial at 1st Storey”.
Shophouses zoned “Commercial” are more straightforward as investment target as it can only be us purely for commercial uses, such as F&B and retail.
When there is a residential element in the shophouse, it involves buyer stamp duties to be paid at purchase, and seller stamp duties if sold within a stipulated time period.
While not overly onerous, this presents another aspect of a shophouse to be managed, in addition to the commercial element.
Tenure
As mentioned earlier, shophouses are predominantly freehold in nature.
While leasehold shophouses may not necessarily be cheaper, given the very strong demand in the overall sector, there certainly are locations where leasehold shophouses can be bought at competitive prices.
For savvy investors or those who do not have a lot of capital to begin with, leasehold shophouses may be an avenue to explore.
Structural condition, capex and conservation status
Some shophouses, especially the ones built or purchased many years back, say in the mid 20th century, when records were not as comprehensive, may have illegal structures, extensions, or mezzanine floors built in.
If you have plans to structurally refurbish a shophouse you just purchased, and you submit renovation plans to URA, they may check, and if found, URA or the relevant government body can require you to make good or demolish any illegal works previously done to the shophouse.
Another aspect of the physical condition of shophouses are that some may have been constructed more than 100 years old and may not have had regular upkeep and maintenance work done. These properties may have timber decay, outdated M&E systems and load limitations, in addition to other structural issues. These need to be checked for thoroughly before any purchase.
Renovation and restoration of shophouses often cost more than modern construction due to the need for specialized materials, craftsmen, and adherence to specific conservation requirements.
If any renovation is planned, the interior and rear portions can be easily uplifted, but care needs to be taken for any works to the facade, structure and character of the building.
Financing
Financing for shophouses can typically go up to 70% to 80% loan-to-value, depending on the purchaser’s income (if an individual) or credit worthiness (if a company).
Taxes
At purchase, these are the taxes that may be incurred
Buyer Stamp Duty and Additional Buyer Stamp Duty if there is a residential component to the shophouse
GST if the seller is GST-registered. Buyers who are also GST-registered can also charge GST when they on-sell the shophouse.
At sale, these are the taxes that may be incurred
Seller Stamp Duty on the residential component if the shophouse is sold within a stipulated time frame
Tenancy and income sustainbility
Shophouses, being a commercially zoned property, attract tenants who naturally are business owners or operators, unlike owner-occupiers in the case of residential properties.
It is ideal that investors be familiar with the commercial and retail sector, its regulations, tenants, and practices.
An investor should also be able to do due diligence on potential tenants and their trades they operate in.
When a buyer purchases a unit used for F&B, they need to check whether F&B use will be permitted to continue, and, if so, for how long. URA typically grants time-limited operational allowances for shophouses, e.g., F&B licenses for 1 year and massage establishments for a period of time.
There may be a risk to a buyer when a shophouse purchased on the assumption that it could continue as an F&B establishment cannot continue in that trade. This could be because surrounding neighbours find that the tenant in the shophouse is causing disamenity, such as noise or rowdiness, to its surroundings.
In such instances, the F&B tenant may need to be replaced with a tenant operating a different business, and depending on who that tenant may be, the rent to the investor may be different from what was expected at the time of investment.
Exit
Shophouses generally attract a savvier type of investor, and the demand pool may be smaller compared to, say, residential properties, when the housing is actually a need from the buyer’s point of view.
Notable deals
Some larger sized shophouse deals in the last 2 years include the following
Rail Mall – S$78.5m, S$744 psf, Upper Bukit Timah Road, Jun 2024
Porcelain Hotel – S$65m, S$10,741 psf, Mosque Street, Mar 2018
On the smaller end of the spectrum in non-central areas, there’s the following
Joo Chiat Rd – S$6.18m, S$6,821 psf, Nov 2025
Ceylon Rd – S$3.85m, S$2,807 psf, Aug 2025
Sembawang Park – S$3.25m, S$1,888 psf, Jul 2025
Challenges and risks investing in shophouses
Investing in shophouses requires more savvy than with residential properties. The following are some risks to consider
Interest rates: Rising rates do affect monthly mortgage payments, and because shophouse prices can be large, the monthly payments can be significant
Tenants: These tend to be business owners and operators, and shophouse investors need to be able to perform due diligence on such tenants
Regulations: There are various regulations governing the structural and physical aspects of shophouses, in addition to the legal aspects related to permitted uses and tenants. If there are residential quarters in a shophouse, the regulations surrounding that also need to be considered
A bright outlook
Shophouses have a long and storied history in Singapore, and it has been a consistent feature of the property landscape since the 1800’s.
The sector has gone through changes, modernized and become an investible asset class that now appeals to both local and foreign investors.
Given that this asset class has stood the test of time, the outlook for shophouses should continue to remain bright for the foreseeable future because of its strong and healthy fundamentals.
Demand is healthy from a modern generation of tenants and their customers; there is virtually no new supply, and the stock of shophouses is low across the island.
Projects, floor plans and pictures of shoe-box units
Why shoe-box units were built
The government’s response to the increased number of shoe-box units
Prices, rents, yields and profitability of shoe-box units
What market trends mean for potential buyers, current owners, and occupants
There was a period of time in Singapore’s property market history where many shoe-box units were built and sold.
This trend of building shoe-box units began in the early to mid-2000s after the SARS health crisis, in response to rising property prices, which made larger units with a large absolute price quantum less well-received by buyers.
Once these shoe-box apartments were built, there was a slew or new and resale transactions up to 2012, when these units were developed, sold, and marketed both on the primary and secondary resale market.
Such units were well-received by buyers due to their palatable price quantum, many of which went below S$500k at the time of sale, despite higher per sq foot prices.
However, as shoe-box units proliferated in many neighborhoods, and with it a rising number of tenants and vehicular traffic (due to many occupants being able to occupy a small building footprint), there were disamenities introduced to various neighbourhoods.
This was especially pertinent in places where landed homes were demolished to make way for projects with shoe-box units.
As you would be able to imagine, a landed house that used to house, say, on average, 5 to 8 people, now has in its place a 5 storey building with 25 units, each housing 1-2 people, for a total of 25-50 people.
Subsequently, the government clamped down to prevent over-building of such units, and since 2012, there have been very few projects with shoe-box units.
With that very brief history of the shoe-box apartment sector covered, we will now dive deeper into its finer details.
Definition of a shoe-box unit
The definition of a shoe-box unit we have adopted is any unit sized below 400 sq ft (37.2 sq m).
Whilst there are other articles online that define a shoe-box unit as below 500 sqft, for our purposes, we’ve adjusted the cutoff to below 400 sqft.
This is because many 1-bedroom units are now sized between 400 and 500 sq ft.
For all intents and purposes, those units that are between 400 to 500 sqft, in my opinion, cannot be classified as shoe-box units, because they generally are livable, at least for 1 occupant.
Shrinking household sizes and more singles have also made living in a 400-500 sqft unit generally more acceptable.
However, the sub-400 sqft units are deemed to be in a different class of their own.
This is because the small sizes of such units generally carry with them negative connotations of a very small and micro-sized space that may impinge on an occupant’s sense of well-being.
Our analysis of shoe-box unit floor plans indicates some common characteristics, such as
Small kitchenettes
Dining space available for a maximum of 2 people
Living room sofas or furniture that usually abut the sides of rooms or balconies (if the shoe-box unit has them)
No area for occupants to put their shoes or shoe racks when they enter the house
In some cases, there are no separate master bedrooms.
Compared to units that are between 400 to 500 sqft, and depending on the type of furniture used by the developer, there will usually be a separate bedroom, a small area at the doorway to put shoes, and possibly a more comfortably sized kitchen to prepare food and have a meal.
Descriptions can only go so far, so we’ve compiled a list of floor plans and photographs of shoe-box units below.
The projects are arranged by those at the top having the highest number of shoe-box units transacted in history, i.e., the Hillford historically has had the highest number of units that changed hands.
The Hillford (398 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of the Hillford has the kitchenette just outside the bathroom and almost abutting the living space.
It’s not the best experience to have the kitchenette ‘facing’ the bathroom.
While there is space for a master bedroom, the wardrobe and area to walk around the bed are very small. The floor plan indicates a small side table on each side, and one of them blocks the waredrobe door.
The good thing is that there is no balcony for this unit, hence allowing for more livable internal space for occupants.
Skysuites @ Anson (365 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Skysuites @ Anson does not have a separate bedroom space which is likely to be a no-no for many occupants. While a sliding door to separate the living area and bedroom can be installed, it is likely to cause the space to feel smaller.
The kitchen somewhat encroaches into the living area, though one redeeming quality is that it is quite squarish in nature.
There internal usable space is further impinged on by the presence of a bay window.
Spottiswoode 18 (388 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Spottiswoode 18 has a very small kitchen, into which the main door opens into.
The dining and living area are very tightly compacted, with space only for a 2 seater dining table where the diners face each other.
The sofa in the living area and bed in the master bedroom also abuts the window to the balcony and aircon ledge respectively.
Espada (363 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Espada has the kitchen area partially obstructed by the main door.
The dining area combined with the kitchen area is fairly typical for shoe-box units.
While there is a separate master bedroom, the whole feel of the space is made somewhat compact because of the sliding door between it and the living/dining area.
The couch in the living room abuts the balcony screen door.
Prestige heights (334 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Prestige Heights shows no separate master bedroom. Whilst there is a square shape kitchenette that could potentially be sealed up, the entire living area, combining the kitchenette, dining, living, and master bedroom, is fused into one space.
The only separate ‘room’ is the bathroom, even then, the location of the bathroom inside the kitchen is, in my opinion, rather disingenuous.
Alexis (388 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of the Alexis looks fairly regular and rectangular in shape and could pass off as a very small one-bedroom.
The main areas, living, dining, kitchen and main bedroom are all separate from each other, suggesting that the design was thought through.
Nevertheless, the fact is that the size is below 400 sqft puts it in the category of a shoe-box unit.
Viva Vista (377 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Viva Vista is also fairly regularly shaped, and the main areas (living, dining, kitchen and bedroom) are all separate.
But there is a common characteristic with other shoe-box units, namely the main door that opens directly into the kitchen meaning there is no separate area for an occupant to put their shoes or a shoe-rack when they enter the unit.
Parc Imperial (398 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Parc Imperial, whilst being fairly regular and rectangular in shape, is similar to Prestige Heights in that there is no standalone master bedroom.
Haig 162 (355 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of Haig 162 is long in shape. Whilst there are no sharp or odd-shaped corners, the dining area is very compact.
This is possibly because dining space was sacrificed to allow for a larger bedroom, household shelter and a balcony.
From the looks of it, any occupant moving from the kitchen to the living area will face a tight squeeze given the narrow walkway.
High Park Residences (388 sqft)
The shoe-box floor plan of High Park Residences is similar to Prestige Heights and Parc Imperial in that there is no standalone master bedroom.
Projects with the most number of shoe-box unit transactions
Between 1995 and 2025, the projects that had the largest number of shoe-box units are listed below, together with the cumulative number of transactions.
The Hillford (Jalan Jurong Kechil) – 292
Skysuites@Anson (Tanjong Pagar area) – 216
Spottiswoode 18 (Tanjong Pagar area) – 205
Espada (Somerset area) – 183
Prestige Heights (Balestier area) – 179
Alexis (Queensway area) – 161
Viva Vista (Buona Vista) – 146
Parc Imperial (Pasir Panjang)- 136
Haig 162 – 121
High Park Residences (Fernvale road) – 107
The Interweave (Balestier area) – 103
Nottinghill Suites (Toh Tuck area) – 103
Suites @ East Coast – 94
Kovan Grandeur – 86
Skysuites17 (Balestier area) – 82
Suites @ Paya Lebar – 79
RV Edge (River Valley) – 64
Suites @ Sims – 60
City Loft (Farrer Park area) – 60
Park Residences Kovan – 59
Why were shoe-box units built?
Firstly, as background, there were virtually no shoe-box units in the Singapore property market before 2005, as there was no market incentive for developers to build such units.
It was only in 2006 and 2007 when property prices started to rise rapidly that developers took notice and started building smaller units with more palatable absolute prices.
This is just but one reason, the other reasons are covered below.
Number of annual shoe box unit transactions
Significant price increases in 2004 to 2006 and the subsequent focus on price quantum instead of per sq feet price
There was a rapid run-up in property prices post-SARS in the years 2004 to 2006, and this caused affordability concerns among buyers.
Naturally, developers responded by building smaller units, which made the overall price quantum more palatable for consumers.
Developers also knew the psychology of buyers, who deprioritized the high per sq foot headline number due to the palatable absolute price quantum.
Investor-driven demand
Shoe-box units are meant primarily for investors and not for families to stay in over the long term, due to its smaller unit sizes.
Before 2010, there were minimal cooling measures on the Singapore property market, and investors were free to buy, rent, or flip properties.
Developers saw there was demand from investors to buy investment properties and subsequently marketed shoe-box units as a useful investment or speculation vehicle, given its low price quantum.
Furthermore, shoe-box units were marketed as a yield-driven play for investors which could provide a source of income at a low price quantum.
Conversion of landed homes to shoe-box units
Small-sized boutique developers, unable to compete in government land sales, turned to purchasing and converting landed homes into projects with shoe-box units
To developers, this was more profitable than simply rebuilding a landed project into a similar, albeit newer landed home.
In addition, such smaller projects were not the typical investment targets of large developers like CapitaLand, CDL and Frasers Property among others. This allowed smaller developers a higher chance in securing pipeline proejcts.
Planning rules rewarded more units, not bigger homes
Under the old Gross Floor Area (GFA) and plot ratio rules, developers maximised value by splitting the allowable floor area into more units.
There was no rule that stipulated a minimum average size of units in a development.
Accordingly, developers tried to build as many units into a project as possible as more units meant more saleable titles and higher total revenue for the developer.
At the same time, there were rising land prices, and developers had to find creative ways to fit more homes on expensive plots to increase overall revenue.
The increase in the single-person population and smaller family sizes created demand for compact, efficient living spaces
On the purchaser’s side of the equation, there was a rising proportion of singles and family sizes that were trending downward.
This resulted in more demand for smaller-sized units to cater, and developers caught on these trends to market shoe-box units to that segment of the population.
The government’s response to the rising prevalence of shoe-box units
For typical investors looking for a source of rental income, shoe-box units are generally welcomed because they provide the ability to buy a unit at a lower price than 1 or 2-bedroom units.
However, a high prevalence of shoe-box units causes disamenity for a neighbourhood, especially when the surrounding public infrastructure cannot accommodate a lot of people.
For example, narrow road lanes in Telok Kurau or the Joo Chiat area can become congested because of the heavy vehicular traffic caused by increased footfall.
These problems became known to the URA, which began to study the trend closely, around the same time as there was a surge in shoe-box transactions in the 2010s.
First round of regulation in 2012
Following the surge in the number of shoe-box units transacted and the disamenity caused to the surrounding area. URA, in 2012, introduced guidelines on the maximum permissible number of dwelling units (DUs) for a non-landed residential development outside the Central Area to moderate the excessive development of shoebox units.
The maximum number of DUs was derived by dividing the proposed building Gross Floor Area (GFA) by 70 square metres (sqm).
Four areas, namely Telok Kurau, Kovan, Joo Chiat, and Jalan Eunos, were subject to more stringent requirements to better address local infrastructure capacity concerns arising from new developments, i.e., the maximum number of DUs was derived by dividing the proposed GFA by 100 sqm.
Second round of regulation in 2018
In 2018, URA observed smaller dwelling unit sizes in new private housing projects. In addition, the number of redevelopments in certain locations began to strain local infrastructure.
The URA therefore revised the existing guideline on the maximum allowable number of DUs for all new flats and condominium developments outside the Central Area to:
URA and LTA have also identified nine areas (Marine Parade, Joo-Chiat Mountbatten, Telok Kurau-Jalan Eunos, Balestier, Stevens-Chancery, Pasir Panjang, Kovan-How Sun, Shelford, and Loyang), where the cumulative effect of new developments could pose a severe strain on local infrastructure. For these areas, the maximum number of DUs for all new flats and condominium developments will be:
In effect, the revised guidelines ensure that developers provide a wide range of unit sizes to cater to the diverse needs of all segments of the market, including larger families.
Third round of regulation in 2023
In 2023, the URA introduced a new regulation, stipulating that all new flats and condominiums within the Central Area, as well as the residential component of commercial and mixed-use developments, will be required to provide a minimum of 20% of DUs with a nett internal area of at least 70sqm.
In totality, the guidelines since 2012 have, in effect, stopped the trend of developers building shoe-box units.
Hence, the stock of such units has reached its peak and is no longer expected to increase. Transactions will then purely be for resales, instead of new sales, and is likely to remain around the range of 100 to 150 resale units transacted annually.
Rents, prices, and yields for shoe-box units
Prices of shoe-box units trended up strongly between 2005 and 2011 when global and Singapore interest rates were low.
As of 2025, average prices stood at S$725k, up from about S$250k in the early 2000s.
This represents an annualized growth rate of about 4.4%, which is just slightly lower, but generally in line with price growth in the overall property market.
There was a period of stagnation between 2011 and 2021 because of various government regulations on the industry.
But prices rose together with the overall market during and after COVID.
Average transacted price of shoe-box units
Average transacted price of shoe-box units
The trends are similar for per sq foot prices, which are now at S$1,911 psf in 2025, up from S$700 in 2000.
Average per sq foot price of shoe-box units
Average per sq foot price of shoe-box units
Rental yields for shoe-box units across our sample of 20 properties with the highest number of cumulative transactions since 1995 range from 4.0% to 5.7%.
The majority of yields are between 4 and 5%.
This is approximately 1.5-3.5% points higher than yields for condominium units.
The highest yield of 5.7% is due to the 60-year tenure of The Hillford.
Apart from The Hillford, Skysuites @ Anson, High Park Residences, and Kovan Grandeur, all other projects in our sample set are freehold in nature.
As is reflective of the market, freehold yields are generally lower than those of leasehold units.
The list below uses only shoe-box units in each development and computes the average rents over the last 2 years, divided by the average transacted prices over the previous 2 years, to determine the rental yields of shoe-box units.
The Hillford (60-year lease) – S$2,800 per month, S$590,000 transacted price, 5.7% gross yield
On average, shoe-box units in a sample of the top 10 properties with the highest number of transactions have more profits than losses.
Average profits range from S$55k to S$150k, though most projects had profits below S$100k. There were very few projects that had units which achieved more than S$100k of profits.
On the other hand, average losses range from S$15k to S$85k.
The higher occurence of profitable transactions is generally expected given the overall upward trend of property prices in Singapore.
Do note that the profits and losses are on an average basis and there are some transactions that have greater profits and losses than average.
One therefore needs to be careful in interpreting this as shoe-box units being a high probability avenue to make profits.
For individual property decisions, a loss can be a significant impact to one’s investment decision or retirement plans, regardless of whatever the average figures show.
Losses have tended to be below S$100k because of the overall smaller quantum of shoe-box units. However, on a percentage level, the losses in some transactions translated to 10% to 20% of the original price, which was a hefty loss, for the owner at that time, to swallow.
The list below shows the average profit and loss of shoe-box units for each project since its development.
The Hillford – S$69k profit (110 transactions), S$15k loss (2 transactions)
Skysuites@Anson – S$75k profit (51 transactions), S$49k loss (13 transactions)
Haig 162 – S$90k (55 transactions), S$55k loss (6 transactions)
High Park Residences (Fernvale road) – S$100k (45 transactions), no losses
Developers of shoe-box units
Developers of projects with a majority of shoe-box units have primarily been small and boutique-sized.
These developers have traditionally been World Class Land, Fragrance Land, and Oxley.
Unable to bid competitively for government land sales sites and lacking expertise in developing large-scale projects, these boutique developers had to fall back on another strategy of making money.
For example, some developers bought clusters of landed homes for redevelopment into mid-sized projects with many shoe-box units.
The larger property companies such as CapitaLand, CDL, and Frasers, including Guocoland, UOL, etc., have not generally developed properties with a large proportion of shoe-box units.
What this means for potential buyers, current owners, and occupants
The shoe-box market has generally stabilized since the boom-and-bust cycle of the past 20 years.
This has reduced the risk of investing in the market, but it has also reduced the potential returns.
Now that the market has stabilized, it is a good time to assess what the future holds for those looking to participate in the shoe-box market.
Potential buyers (investors or owner occupiers)
Investing in the Singapore property market generally provides a positive return over time, and this is likely to be the case for shoe-box units too.
For investors who do not yet own a unit, there are multiple considerations given the additional buyer stamp duty regime in Singapore.
One key consideration is whether you have a ‘free’ name to own the unit.
As we mentioned earlier, the rents for shoe-box units are generally in the range of S$2,000-3,500 per month with yields ranging between 4-5+%.
For investors seeking a monthly income stream, this monthly paycheck can be attractive.
For owner-occupiers, the general advice is that living in shoe-box units is not something that can be done over a long period of time.
If you want to stay for a short to medium-term period, then that will be fine.
But life circumstances change, and it is more likely than not that you will need to find a larger unit. Buying a small unit does not provide you with the optionality to accommodate future changes.
However, if your budget only allows you to purchase a shoe-box unit, which, as we mentioned earlier, is in the range of S$600k to S$900k, then that is certainly something to consider.
At a price of S$750k, 3.5% interest rate, 30-year loan tenure, and 75% loan-to-value, the monthly mortgage is S$2,526.
Assuming a debt service ratio of 30%, someone earning about S$8.4k a month should be able to service such a property comfortably.
For investors who are thinking of renting out the unit, the monthly rent paid by the tenant should be able to cover the mortgage partially.
However, one must bear in mind that there is a potential chance to suffer losses on investing in shoe-box units.
Furthermore, the future buyer of your shoe-box unit will be limited to a smaller buyer pool.
Current owners
Most shoe-box units are freehold in nature, and that is a plus point for investors who would like to hold something for multiple generations.
One thing to consider is that most buildings, especially those with a large proportion of shoe-box units, do become obsolete with time, regardless of whether they are freehold or leasehold in nature. For projects with many shoe-box units, this is even more important because of the possibly frequent turnover of tenants, the smaller-sized nature of developments (say, less than 100 units), and generally lower quality of upkeep.
With the profitability analysis done earlier, there is also a potential chance for units held by current owners to be sitting on a loss-making position (i.e. latest valuation is lower than purchase price).
In such a situation, current owners need to have a plan to either cut losses or to hold on for the long-term, but potentially never be able to recoup the initial purchase cost.
Tenants
For tenants, the advantage of staying in a shoe-box unit is that you will have the whole space to yourself, vis-à-vis renting one room in a, say, 4-bedroom unit, and sharing with other tenants.
This can provide a greater level of privacy than communal living does.
Rents will definitely be lower than comparable 1-bedroom units, and you still get a space that has functionality (kitchen, dining, living area, possibly a separate bedroom).
Contact us
If you’re interested in buying, selling, or renting out your shoe-box unit or other properties, feel free to drop us a line, and we’ll be happy to share our market insights and expertise with you.
The value of new private property sales in Nov 2025 reached a total of S$892 million, mainly due to the launch of The Sen at the junction of Old Jurong Road Jalan Jurong Kechil.
The average price per sq foot of all new sales in the month was S$2,528, with the lowest being Altura at S$1,491 psf (as it it an executive condominium) and the highest being Park Nova at S$4,462 psf.
1. The Sen
The project that sold the highest value of new units was The Sen at the junction of Old Jurong Road and Jalan Jurong Kechil, in district 21.
The total amount of sales was S$151 million at an average price of S$2,350 per square feet.
A total of 77 new units were sold at the project, and as of the time of writing, 80 of 347 units across the entire project have been sold since launch this month.
2. The Continuum
The second project that sold the highest value of new units was the Continuum at Thiam Siew Avenue, in district 15.
The total amount of sales was S$52 million at an average price of S$2,630 per square feet.
A total of 22 new units were sold at the project, and as of the time of writing, 672 of 816 units across the entire project have been sold since launch in May 2023.
3. Bloomsbury Residences
The third project that sold the highest value of new units was Bloomsbury Residences at Media Circle, in district 13.
The total amount of sales was S$51 million at an average price of S$2,545 per square feet.
A total of 22 new units were sold at the project, and as of the time of writing, 268 of 358 units across the entire project have been sold since launch in Apr 2025.
4. Zyon Grand
The fourth project that sold the highest value of new units was Zyon Grand at Zion Road, in district 3.
The total amount of sales was S$49 million at an average price of S$3,189 per square feet.
A total of 19 new units were sold at the project, and as of the time of writing, 607 of 706 units across the entire project have been sold since launch in Oct 2025.
5. One Marina Gardens
The fifth project that sold the highest value of new units was One Marina Gardens at Marina Gardens Drive, in district 1.
The total amount of sales was S$44 million at an average price of S$2,998 per square feet.
A total of 18 new units were sold at the project, and as of the time of writing, 558 of 937 units across the entire project have been sold since launch in Apr 2025.
The value of resale private property sales in Nov 2025 reached a total of S$1.2 billion.
The average price per sq foot of all resales in the month was S$1,680, with the lowest being a unit at Kindol Gardens at S$549 psf and the highest being Sculptura Ardmore at S$6,193 psf.
1. Rivercove Residences
The project that re-sold the highest value of units was Rivercove Residences at Anchorvale Lane in district 19.
The total amount of sales was S$21 million at an average price of S$1,626 per square feet.
A total of 13 units were re-sold at the project in Nov 2025, out of a total of 628 in the development.
2. Sculptura Ardmore
The second project that re-sold the highest value of units was the Sculptura Ardmore at Ardmore Park, in district 10.
The total amount of sales was S$20 million at an average price of S$6,193 per square feet.
Only 1 unit was re-sold at the project in Nov 2025, out of a total of 35 in the development.
3. 1 Canberra
The third project that re-sold the highest value of units was 1 Canberra at Canberra Road, in district 27.
The total amount of sales was S$15 million at an average price of S$1,294 per square feet.
A total of 10 units were re-sold at the project in Nov 2025, out of a total of 665 in the development.
4. Marina One Residences
The fourth project that re-sold the highest value of units was Marina One Residences at Marina Way, in district 1.
The total amount of sales was S$14 million at an average price of S$2,000 per square feet.
A total of 6 units were re-sold at the project in Nov 2025, out of a total of 1,042 in the development.
5. Valley Park
The fifth project that re-sold the highest value of units was Valley Park at River Valley Road, in district 10.
The total amount of sales was S$14 million at an average price of S$2,257 per square feet.
A total of 5 units were re-sold at the project in Nov 2025, out of a total of 728 in the development.
Singaporeans, by far, have been and remain the primary buyers of Singapore’s private non-landed (excluding EC) properties.
Apart from Singaporeans, which nationality has been the primary purchaser of Singapore’s non-landed properties, and how has this changed over time?
Firstly let’s take a look at the long-term history of property buyers and their nationality.
Proportion of Singapore non-landed property purchases by nationality
The orange section indicates buyers from China. This portion has been increasing as China’s economy grows and its people become richer.
Some of their people then migrate or come to Singapore to buy properties.
The dark blue section, attributable to Malaysian buyers, has been relatively stable.
The pink section, representing Indian buyers, has grown but has been stable since 2010.
On the left, there’s a large proportion of light blue and green, attributable to Indonesia and companies. This proportion has fallen over time.
For purposes of this post, the top 10 nationalities are determined by the cumulative number of new, resale, and sub-sale transactions from 1995 to 2025.
The largest buyer groups, together with the number of cumulative purchases over 1995 to 2025 by them in brackets, apart from Singaporeans (413,369), are
Malaysia (29,796)
China (26,558)
Indonesia (20,844)
Purchases by companies (13,234)
India (12,667)
United Kingdom (4,853)
USA (4,117)
Foreigner (un-specified) (3,982)
Australia (3,205)
Taiwan (2,678)
The other buyer nationalities, ranking from 11-20, are
Korea
Hong Kong
Myanmmar
Philippines
Canada
France
Vietnam
Japan
Germany
Switzerland
For purposes of understanding the broader picture, the buyer nationalities that are ranked 11-20 are not critically important, as collectively they do not contribute a large proportion to overall transaction volume.
With that backdrop in mind, here are some insights based on the numbers.
1. Chinese buyers began to grow very significantly from 2010
Concurrent with China’s explosive growth in the 2000s, its proportion as buyers has similarly grown.
Purchasers in 2025 by nationality: Chinese buyers account for 25% of the year’s total (excluding Singaporeans), followed by 16% from Malaysia.
In comparison, purchases by Chinese buyers in 2000, as a proportion of that year’s total (excluding Singaporeans), were only 2%. Malaysian and Indonesian buyers were many multiple times larger at 24% and 18% respectively.
The chart below presents the absolute number of Chinese buyers, which has increased significantly since 1995.
Number of Chinese buyers of Singapore’s non-landed properties
Looking forward, based on China’s growth trends, which is decently healthy compared to global levels, and Singapore’s relatively open economy, the proportion of purchases attributable to Chinese buyers is likely to remain at these high levels.
2. Indian buyers have stayed stable since 2010
Another large Asian economy with historically strong cultural and financial ties to Singapore is India.
As a buyer group, their purchases of Singapore property were relatively small before 2010, averaging about 5% of the annual total (excluding Singaporeans).
The chart below shows the absolute number of Indian buyers.
Number of Indian buyers of Singapore’s non-landed properties
Over the years, as the economy grew and Indian citizens’ financial exports increased, the share of purchases attributable to Indians rose marginally to about 10% in 2010 and has remained at around that level since.
Given India’s greater distance from Singapore than other Southeast Asian economies, the proportion of purchases by this buyer group is unlikely to increase significantly.
3. Proportion of Malaysian buyers have generally been consistent
Malaysia’s very close proximity to Singapore has made its citizens look south for many of their property purchases.
And this is indeed borne out in the numbers.
The chart below shows the absolute number of Malaysian buyers.
As buyers, Malaysians have cumulatively (between 1995 and 2025) been the largest group to purchase Singapore property.
At its peak, Malaysian buyers accounted for just under 50% of the annual total of buyers (excluding Singaporeans) in 2002, but this was an outlier.
At a more stable level, however, the proportion attributable to them (excluding Singaporeans) hovers between 15 and 20%, which is still a substantial share.
Whilst the proportion in recent years has fallen, this is simply due to a larger share being taken up by Chinese buyers, and to a lesser extent, Indians.
In the future, I expect the proportion of Malaysian buyers to continue being the highest, if not the second highest, simply because of the country’s proximity to Singapore.
Additionally, the train link between Woodlands in Singapore and Johor Bahru, expected to be operational in 2026, is set to draw the two countries closer together.
4. Indonesian buyers were significant before 2015, but no longer are
Indonesia is another fairly large-sized economy that has featured prominently in Singapore’s property market.
The early 2000s were a period when Indonesia’s GDP growth was relatively strong, at 5% or more. Since there were strong trade linkages between the two countries, it is not a surprise that the annual proportion of Indonesian buyers (excluding Singaporeans) was around 18% (in 2000 and 2005).
The chart below shows the absolute number of Indonesian buyers.
Number of Indonesian buyers of Singapore’s non-landed properties
However, as Indonesia’s property market developed and its citizens had options to purchase housing domestically, the proportion of Indonesian buyers of Singapore property declined.
In 2010, excluding Singaporean buyers, the proportion was 15%; by 2025, it had fallen to 4%.
Another reason for the decline in Indonesian buyers in Singapore may have been the depreciation of the Rupiah.
In the early 2000s, 1 Singapore dollar was equivalent to about 5,000 Indonesian Rupiah, and by 2025, it had risen to about 13,000 Indonesian Rupiah.
5. Company purchases were significant before 2010, but no longer are
Purchases by companies were substantial before 2010 but have not been since then.
The chart below shows the absolute number of purchases attributable to companies, and it is evident that there has been a stark decline, with the total purchases totalling only 6 in 2025.
Number of Company buyers of Singapore’s non-landed properties
In the future, it is unlikely for purchases by companies to increase, given the increased focus by the government on anti-money laundering and preventing opaque ownership of property.
6. Buyers from the UK were not large to begin with, and their proportion has fallen over time
Another country worth mentioning is the UK, which accounted for 5% of annual total purchases (excluding Singaporeans) in 2000.
Singapore must have been an attractive destination for British investment in the past, given the promise of strong growth (substantially greater than that achieved in the UK).
However, at the individual level, the depreciation of the British pound presented a headwind that few offshore investors could stomach.
The chart below shows how the British pound has depreciated against the Singapore dollar over the years, and that could have been one reason for the falling participation by UK buyers (and at the same, the increase of Singapore buyers in UK property due to the stronger Singapore dollar)
Contact us
Interested in a deeper understanding of the property market?
Drop us a line with your thoughts, suggestions, insights, or questions.
Buyer demand has been healthy, supported by declining interest rates and large-scale government plans
Supply is low, resulting in low vacancy rates and low availability of product, which is feeding into support for rents and prices
Singapore private residential property prices are expected to rise similarly to historical trends in 2026, meaning about 2 to 4% for the whole year.
Recap
First a recap of how Singapore’s property prices have moved over the years.
The chart below shows the property price index across the island, OCR, RCR and CCR.
Prices have grown strongly over the last 5 years, especially through the COVID period, which was a seeming anomaly.
Who would have thought that a health crisis could have such a far-reaching impact on property prices.
In hindsight, we now know that because of an increase in the cost of raw materials (concrete, steel etc.) and labour, that has translated into a higher price for the end product, in this case the physical property product.
Will there continue to be an increase in property prices?
Given the balance of factors that will be examined in some detail below, there is likely to be a continuation of price growth of between 2-4% in 2026.
Between 1975 and 2025, Singapore’s islandwide property prices have grown by a compound annual growth rate of 6.2%.
Between 2000 and 2025, the compound annual growth rate has fallen to a healthy 3%.
The decline in compound annual growth rate is not to be mistaken for a weak property market, but rather one that reflects a maturing, healthy, and stable environment.
The main reason for lower growth is Singapore’s economic growth, which has transitioned to a lower and more stable level.
Without further ado, I lay out the thinking behind how the property market is likely to develop in 2026.
To systematically approach the forward view, I look individually at each component that has a link with price.
These factors have either a direct or indirect link.
Demand / sales
In terms of demand for private non-landed residential projects, there was a recent uptick in volume at the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025.
This healthy sentiment was helped partly by the decrease in interest rates that came down from about 3% in 2023 and 2024 to approximately 1% as of the time of this writing at the end of December 2025.
At the same time, numerous government plans such as the Greater Southern Waterfront, Paya Lebar Airbase, Jurong Region MRT line, Circle Line completion, Bukit Timah Turf Club redevelopment, among others, catalyzed the vision for continued growth of the country.
The key question is whether positive sentiment is likely to continue, and there is nothing on the horizon that suggests it will be derailed, bar something external that happens globally.
The following chart shows the planned private residential and EC units in the pipeline, which appear to be coming off their recent peak.
Whether it is the beginning of a down-cycle remains to be seen, but a low number here means that the number of units being launched for sale or will be completing in future is likely to be low, suggesting that prices of non-landed properties will be somewhat supported, at least until the pipeline / supply figures start rising again.
The second-order impact on supply is the sale of land by the government and en-bloc transactions.
Developers will be inclined to bid more aggressively for sites because of a dwindling land bank.
Expect to see stepped up activity by large developers such as CapitaLand, City Developments, Frasers Property and Guocoland and others when the government releases land for sale.
Given potential changes to the en-bloc market, expect developers also to be on a keen lookout for sites that could be purchased for redevelopment.
Unsold units
At the same time as there being high demand and low supply, the number of unsold private residential units is also at a low point.
This has happened because stronger demand than supply has reduced the number of unsold units.
This suggests that, at this point in time, buyers or investors looking to purchase a unit will not have much choice since there isn’t much product available in the market, resulting in more competition between buyers.
Vacancy
The interaction between strong recent demand and low supply (which both have resulted in a low number of unsold units and high competition between potential buyers) is resulting in vacancy rates of Singapore’s non-landed residential units reaching a cyclical low of 6.4% as of 3rd quarter 2025, as can be seen in the chart below.
The vacancy rate has never fallen below 5% since 1988.
This suggests that together with a low supply of units being completed, rents are likely to remain strong for the foreseeable future.
While rents are not the main topic of interest for us, healthy rents are likely to lead to positive knock-on effects on prices when investors see that the market is potentially healthy.
The chart below shows rents across the islandwide, in the OCR, RCR, and CCR.
Compared to non-landed private property prices, rents have somewhat flatlined post a surge during the COVID period of 2021 and 2022.
The most likely reason is that as private property rents increased, potential tenants shifted to renting HDBs.
At the same time, there was an increase in the HDB supply and acceleration of completions by the government to make up for the delays during COVID.
At the bottom line, however, the high rents for private properties have a positive knock-on effect on prices.
Singapore’s compound SORA – 1 month has dropped from a high of approximately 3.5% in 2023 and 2024 to quite a low figure of just above 1% as of the time of this post being written.
The decrease in interest rates has likely helped to boost demand among buyers.
Looking forward, given that the interest rate easing cycle in the US and Europe has almost ended, future decreases in Singapore’s interest rates are likely to be very small.
At the same time, economic growth across the world is weak, and the US and Europe are likely to keep interest rates at their current levels for the next 1-2 years.
This would suggest that Singapore’s interest rates will remain at or around the current levels.
New condominium launches in 2026
Various brokerage firms and consultancies are predicting between 17 to 22 projects launching for sale in 2026, equating to about 1 to 2 every month.
The total number of units launched is likely to range between 8,000 to 10,000 units, or around 500 per development.
Most of the launches will be in the OCR, with about 4-5 new ECs launched in the year.
Large-scale plans by the government
Greater Southern Waterfront
In 2025, the Greater Southern Waterfront (GSW) is set to be Singapore’s most ambitious urban transformation, expanding six times the size of Marina Bay.
Spanning from Pasir Panjang to Marina East, this initiative integrates the city’s maritime heritage with sustainable living, featuring a continuous coastal promenade and nature corridors like the Southern Ridges.
The plan includes high-quality public housing at prime sites like Bukit Chermin and Keppel Club, promoting inclusivity and accessibility.
Covering about 2,000 hectares, the GSW aims to create a vibrant live-work-play environment as container port operations move to Tuas. The project envisions new homes, commercial districts, parks, and improved public transport.
With a focus on green infrastructure, the GSW promises to enhance recreation, biodiversity, and climate resilience, transforming southern Singapore into a sustainable waterfront city over the coming decades.
Paya Lebar airbase
The Paya Lebar Airbase (PLAB) redevelopment is a significant long-term urban transformation project in Singapore, set to begin relocating the airbase in the 2030s.
This will free up approximately 800 hectares of land for a new mixed-use town, accommodating around 150,000–160,000 new homes along with residential, commercial, and job nodes. The URA Draft Master Plan envisions this area as a next-generation neighborhood featuring integrated transport, green spaces, and community facilities, while preserving elements of the airbase’s heritage, such as the runway.
The initiative aims to meet housing demands and improve the quality of life by bringing employment closer to residential areas, enhancing connectivity, and allowing for taller developments in surrounding towns.
Spanning two to three decades, the project will also include new transport links and urban networks to improve connectivity in the east and northeast regions.
Contact us
We’d love to hear from you.
Drop us a line with your thoughts, queries, and suggestions.
The Bayshore precinct in Singapore is eagerly anticipating the Bayshore condo launch in 2026, embodying a master-planned fusion of tranquil East Coast living and vibrant urban life. Known for its “garden-to-gate” philosophy, it offers a lush, car-lite landscape with easy access to East Coast Park, featuring scenic cycling paths and walking trails. The architecture enhances views of the Singapore Strait, complemented by greenery that blends with the tropical surroundings.
The area is well-connected to the Central Business District via the Thomson-East Coast Line, creating a serene yet accessible environment. A hub for outdoor enthusiasts, it boasts miles of coastal paths and sandy beaches, along with a rich culinary scene from local hawker stalls to trendy cafes.
As the precinct transforms into a waterfront estate with 10,000 new homes, including an upcoming condominium development right beside Bayshore MRT, it maintains its charm while enhancing pedestrian connectivity. With amenities promoting cycling and walking, Bayshore exemplifies ideal coastal living, balancing urban convenience and natural beauty amidst a relaxed atmosphere.
Seaside Residences
There is one other large-scale condominium development that was launched in the past in the Bayshore and East Coast area, and that is the current Seaside residences, which is west of the Bayshore condominium.
That piece of land was sold by the government in January 2016 and won by a consortium comprising Frasers Property and Sekisui House.
The winning bid for the Seaside Residences is S$624,180,000 or S$858 psf per plot ratio.
In comparison, the Bayshore land plot was sold to SingHaiyi for S$658,888,998 or S$1,388 psf per plot ratio, or 62% higher than the Seaside Residences plot based on the pricing psf per plot ratio.
The upcoming Bayshore condominium is likely to have the same vibe as Seaside Residences, given its location right beside the East Coast Park, and along the East Coast area.
Latest pricing of Seaside residences, based on transactions in the last 2 years, is between S$1,938 psf to S$2,638 psf, with absolute quantums between S$950k to S$4.4m.
In terms of rents, Seaside Residences is commanding between S$2,900 to S$12,500 per month.
All resale transactions of Seaside Residences have been profitable, with profits ranging from S$8k (0.2% annualized) to S$1.29m (5.5% annualized).
The profitability of Seaside Residences suggests that the Bayshore condominium project should perform well too. This, however, depends on the launch price by the developer, which we will update once figures are released.
Immediate nearby developments – Costa Del Sol, The Bayshore and Bayshore Park
Apart from Seaside Residences, which is slightly further West from the upcoming Bayshore condominium, there are three nearer comparable developments, namely Costa Del Sol, The Bayshore, and Bayshore Park. These projects are all to the west of the subject project and separated from the actual train station by just the small side Bayshore Road.
All three developments are 99-year leasehold projects and are fairly old. hence the Bayshore condominium is likely to be well-received for its newness. The remaining years of lease range from 60 (Bayshore Park) to 78 years (Costa Del Sol).
There is a healthy transaction volume of an average of 70 units in each project over the last 2 years, or an average of about 35 annually.
This indicates that the market in the area is liquid, and sellers who hope to sell in the future are unlikely to find it difficult to find potential buyers.
A benefit of a large scale development is that the bid-ask spread will be smaller. In a small or boutique scale development, the number of transactions will generally be fewer, and this typically leads to a wide bid-ask spread or a gap between what buyers and sellers ask for. This typically results in weak pricing performance.
Over the last 2 years, the pricing range for the 3 surrounding projects has been from S$1,057 psf to S$2,102 psf.
In terms of absolute pricing, the range is from S$808k to S$3.41m.
There are no unprofitable transactions across all three surrounding projects. This speaks to the nature and livability of the bayshore location, which is highly attractive to investors and owners.
Key details of each project are as follows
Costa Del Sol
Completed / age: 2004, 78 years remaining
Tenure: 99 years
Number of transactions over last 2 years: 74
Psf pricing range over last 2 years: S$1,421 (2 May 2024 – 4 bedroom) to S$2,102 (20 Jan 2025 – 4 bedroom)
Absolute pricing range over last 2 years: S$1.58m to S$3.41m
Profit: no unprofitable transactions. Highest profit of S$1.9m was for a unit held for 18 years with an annualized gain of 6.1%. Lowest profit of S$412k for unit held for close to 11 years with an annualized gain of 1.6%.
The Bayshore
Completed / age: 1999 / 73 years remaining
Tenure: 99 years
Number of transactions over last 2 years: 73
Psf pricing range over last 2 years: S$1,207 (4 Jul 2024 – 3 bedroom) to S$1,537 (8 Jul 2024 – 4 bedroom)
Absolute pricing range over last 2 years: S$1.13m to S$2.2m
Profit: no unprofitable transactions. Highest profit of S$1.1m was for unit a held for 19 years with an annualized gain of 6.7%. Lowest profit of S$210k for unit held for close to 11 years with an annualized gain of 1.7%.
Comments: The Bayshore generally has lower profit than Costa Del Sol or Bayshore Park because of the unfavourable layout of units. Most of them have irregular and triangular-shaped rooms, which does not make for ideal space planning or livability.
Bayshore Park
Completed / age: 1986 / 60 years remaining
Tenure: 99 years
Number of transactions over last 2 years: 62
Psf pricing range over last 2 years: S$1,057 (8 Oct 2024 – a large unit, so the psf price is potentially low) to S$1,517 (7 Oct 2025 – 3 bedroom)
Absolute pricing range over last 2 years: S$808k to S$2.75m
Profit: no unprofitable transactions. Highest profit of S$1.9m for unit held for 20 years with an annualized gain of 6.6%. Lowest profit of S$128k for unit held for 5 years with an annualized gain of 3.4%.
Rents
There are likely to be multiple pools of renters for the Bayshore condominium given its proximity to the airport, Changi Business Park, Paya Lebar commercial district, and the highway, which leads quickly to the CBD for those who drive.
Specifically, rental demand will come from
Air crew: This group will favour the close proximity to Changi Airport, since the Bedok South, Sungei Bedok, and Xilin train stations are expected to be completed by 2H 2026.
Office workers in the Paya Lebar commercial district and CBD: The brown Thomson East Coast line can bring workers directly from Bayshore to Marina Bay station, which is a key commercial node with office buildings such as Marina Bay Financial Centre, Marina One, and Asia Square
Rents of the three surrounding projects range from a low of S$1,850 per month for 1-bedroom units to a high of S$11,700 per month for 4 or more bedroom units, averaging at around S$5,000 per month.
Specifically, the rents at Costa Del Sol range from S$3,6000 to S$6,300 per month, rents at The Bayshore range from S$2,900 to S$11,700 per month, and rents at Bayshore Park range from S$1,850 to S$10,250 per month,
Expected pricing of Bayshore Condominium
Given the land price of S$1,388 psf per plot ratio paid by SingHaiyi, the average selling price of the Bayshore condominium could range from about S$2,800 to S$3,200 psf.
Based on average unit sizes and an average per sq ft pricing of S$3,000, the absolute prices could be as follows (but this is still to be confirmed)
The exit potential for an investment in this project is likely to be fairly healthy.
Firstly, the location by the sea is attractive not just to those living in the area but also farther inland, such as the Bedok, Tanah Merah, and Kembangan areas.
In fact, residents from even further inland could be attracted to the location as it is deemed to be an ‘upgrade’ in lifestyle to move closer to the water’s edge.
Hence, the potential buyer pool is expected to be fairly large.
Secondly, there is just one other government land plot available for sale so this opportunity to stay near East Coast Park is quite rare.
The other land plot is to the East of the Bayshore development and hence further from the city.
This land plot is targeted for sale in Mar 2026 and is meant for commercial and residential use.
An estimated 1,280 housing units can be built in this development, more than double the 500+ units planned for the Bayshore development.
This means that the Bayshore development is likely to be more exclusive with the condominium amenities shared by fewer residents.
Nearby Schools
Within 1 km of the Bayshore condominium is Temasek Primary, and within 2km are Bedok Green Primary, Fengshan Primary, and Opera Estate Primary, based on OneMap.
Amenities
The East Coast area in Singapore is a vibrant blend of leisure, culture, and culinary delights. Famous for the sprawling East Coast Park, residents and visitors can enjoy cycling along scenic paths, jogging on picturesque trails, or simply relaxing on sandy beaches.
The park is a hub for outdoor enthusiasts, with water sports like kayaking and stand-up paddleboarding readily available.
Culinary delights abound at the nearby hawker centres, offering a taste of local specialties from satay to laksa, alongside trendy cafes and beach bars perfect for unwinding.
For families, attractions like the East Coast Lagoon Food Village provide a lively atmosphere, while various parks and playgrounds cater to children.
Cultural spots like the Joo Chiat precinct reveal a rich blend of heritage and modernity, filled with charming shophouses, boutique stores, and art galleries.
Overall, East Coast embodies a unique coastal living experience, balancing urban convenience with nature’s tranquility.
Some pictures of the nearby amenities include the following.
Siglap centre
Bedok 85 hawker centre
Bedok Food centre
East Coast food village
Wake board park
Bedok Mall
Changi Business Park
In the future, when the Bayshore area is built up, it will be a vibrant area with many amenities and facilities for residents.
The 60-ha precinct at completion will have a total of about 12,5000 dwelling units of public and private housing.
There will be a 1 km-long main street with wide pavements for a pleasant walking and cycling experience.
Showflat location
This is to be confirmed but please get in touch with us to stay updated if you would like to find out more about the project.
Launch date
The launch date is likely to be early to mid-2026, but it is yet to be confirmed. Please get in touch with us to stay updated.
Contact us
Drop us a line to find out more about the upcoming Bayshore private condominium development or if you have any other real estate related query.
Who have been the main buyers of Singapore’s non-landed properties over time?
Are they Singaporeans, Singapore permanent residents, or foreigners?
Ask around, and chances are that you will hear a common gripe about purchases by permanent residents and foreigners being the main cause of rising property prices over the years.
In this article, I seek to put some numbers on who has been the main group of buyers of non-landed condominiums in Singapore.
The history of data available dates back to 1995, and because it is a substantial period of time, I have broadly broken the analysis into 3 periods for easier understanding.
Pre-2001, which encompasses the boom before the Asian Financial Crisis, the Asian financial crisis in 199,7 and the dot-com boom and bust in 2001
2001 to 2008, which encompasses the post-dot-com period, SARS in 2003, the strong market growth after SARS, and the global financial crisis in 2007 and 2008
2009 to 2025 which encompasses the post-global financial crisis period, strong growth ,and many rounds of property market cooling measures by the government
Summary
Purchases by Singaporeans have been the most among all groups. It has been stable between 60% and 80% over the years
Purchases by Singapore permanent residents have increased consistently over the years
Purchases by companies and foreigners have virtually disappeared due to onerous and hefty taxes
Proportion of non-landed property purchases (new, resale, sub-sale) from 2001 to 2025, broken into 3 periods of pre-2001, 2001 to 2008, and 2009 to 2025
Pre-2001
Singaporean: 75% (most, first)
Singapore PR: 8% (third)
Foreigner: 9% (second)
Company: 5% (fourth)
N.A: 3% (least, fifth)
During the pre-2001 period, there were very few restrictions on the purchase of non-landed properties by permanent residents and foreigners.
The proportion of Singaporeans buying properties was stable between 70% and 80%.
When the Asian financial crisis hit in 1997, the proportion of buying by permanent residents and foreigners began to dip, which was understandable given their loss of jobs and their having to return to their home country.
Purchases by companies were negligible.
Proportion of non-landed property purchases (new, resale, sub-sale) from 1995 to 2000
2001 to 2008
Singaporean: 72% (most, first)
Singapore PR: 13% (second)
Foreigner: 11% (third)
Company: 4% (fourth)
N.A: <1% (least, fifth)
During the period after the Asian financial crisis and dot-com boom and bust, the proportion of Singaporean purchases began a long downtrend to around 2008.
This was because, as Singapore’s economy started to hum, foreigners started coming back to the country and more permanent residencies were granted (as part of the government’s more open policy to support GDP growth by increasing the population).
Interest rates in the US, and accordingly Singapore, during this period of time, were also on a downtrend.
As a result, the proportion of buyers who were permanent residents, foreigners, and companies began to increase.
When the global financial crisis hit in 2008, the same story as the Asian financial crisis repeated itself.
Foreign and permanent resident buyers began to leave, resulting in more purchases attributable to Singaporeans.
This can be seen at the right side of the chart, where the proportion of Singapore buyers started rising from about 60% at the start of 2008 to 70% at the end of 2008.
The proportion of purchases by companies was negligible.
Proportion of non-landed property purchases (new, resale, sub-sale) from 2001 to 2008
2009 to today
Singaporean: 75% (most, first)
Singapore PR: 17% (second)
Foreigner: 7% (third)
Company: <1% (tied last, fourth)
N.A.: <1% (tied last, fourth)
Finally, looking at the last period of time, between 2009 and 2025, there is a clear trend that is the reverse of what happened between 2001 and 2008.
The market began to be dominated by Singaporeans and Singaporean permanent resident buyers.
Purchases by foreigners and companies virtually fell out of the picture and in totality amounted to less than 1%. This was due to onerous and hefty taxes imposed on these classes of buyers.
Of course, hiding within the statistics are the types of Singaporeans – did these buyers grow up in Singapore, or are they so-called “new citizens” who were from other countries but became Singapore citizens, and if so, was it recently or many years back that they converted their residency status?
Purchases by companies were negligible.
Proportion of non-landed property purchases (new, resale, sub-sale) from 2009 to 2025
Conclusion
There are a number of implications of the trends outlined above.
Properties in the core central region that have traditionally been bought by foreigners are now increasingly being bought by Singaporeans or Singaporean permanent residents.
Whilst data is not available, these “Singaporeans” are likely those who converted to holding citizenship from their previous status as Singapore permanent residents.
This is understandable because the very definition of a Singaporean is changing as the country is a cosmopolitan society and a melting pot that comprises people from many different societies and origins.
The increasing number of Singaporeans or Singapore permanent residents buying in the core central regions (as opposed to mainly foreigners) is potentially a good thing.
This is because prices are likely to be more stable as they will be less susceptible to inflows and outflows of hot money that are characteristic of foreign buyers.
Potentially, however, the flip side to the coin, where there is a decreasing proportion of foreigners, is the implication that the property market, or possibly the country by extension, is becoming less open to those who do not have long-term roots in the country.
This could mean various things economically, but speaking to property investors specifically, it may be prudent to rethink any reliance of their investment on foreigners.
If you bought a property with the intention of renting it out or selling it to foreigners, the market may not be as deep as before.
Contact us
We’ve got a lot more insights and data available that’s useful for anyone involved in the property market.
This post provides a summary of the transactions across private condominiums, executive condominiums and landed properties in Singapore in the month of Nov 2025.
Private condominiums
Across new sale condominiums in the month of November, per sq foot prices averaged S$2,578, with the highest being in district 10 (Orchard) at S$3,709 and the lowest in district 17 (Changi and Pasir Ris) at S$2,102.
New projects that were sold in these areas were mainly
District 10: Park Nova, Upperhouse, and Skye at Holland
District 17: Kassia
Average per square foot prices (S$) by district in November for condominiums and apartments (new sale only)
Across new, resale, and sub-sale condominiums in the month of November, per sq foot prices averaged S$2,049, with the highest being in district 6 (City Hall, Clarke Quay) at S$3,226 and the lowest in district 17 (Changi and Pasir Ris) at S$1,326.
Projects that were sold in these areas were mainly
District 6: One Marina Gardens (new sale) and Marina One Residences (resale)
District 17: Mix of new sale and resale transactions across Hedges Park Condominium, Parc Olympia, and The Jovell
Average per square foot prices (S$) by district in November for condominiums and apartments (new sale, resale, and sub-sale)
Across new, resale, and sub-sale executive condominiums in the month of November, per sq foot prices averaged S$1,465, with the highest being in district 24 (Lim Chu Kang, Tengah) at S$1,739 and the lowest in district 25(Kranji and Woodgrove) at S$1,087.
Projects that were sold in these areas were mainly
District 24: Otto Place, Novo Place, Copen Grand
District 25: Northwave, Woodsvale, Forestville, Northoaks
Average per square foot prices (S$) by district in November for executive condominiums (new sale, resale, and sub-sale)
Landed properties
Across new, resale, and sub-sale landed transactions in the month of November, per sq foot prices averaged S$2,042.
The majority of landed transactions are concentrated in districts 10 (Bukit Timah, Holland), 14 (Geylang, Eunos), 15 (Katong, Joo Chiat), 16 (Bedok, East Coast), and 19 (Serangoon Gardens, Hougang), which have more prevalence of landed properties.
Average per square foot prices (S$) by district in November for landed properties (new sale, resale, and sub-sale)
List of postal districts for reference
Subscribe
Contact us
We have a real-time list of residential, commercial and industrial transactions. Feel free to reach out to us for more information using the contact form below.